Earlier this year, I have suggested together with other colleagues to the Icelandic government to use open-source software in order to save money. While we mentioned there already the opportunity to gain digital sovereignty, this has become even more important with the new administration in the U.S., i.e. being dependent on Microsoft or any other US software provider can be dangerous, because a "kill switch" could lead to making US software stop working and loosing access to your data that is stored in the cloud of an US company. Note that also European companies that use internally US-services are affected, e.g. while Spotify is Swedish, it uses both the Google and Amazon cloud for delivering their services. (And of course, this is not just about US services, but also about US operating systems, i.e. Microsoft Windows, Apple OS and iOS, and also the Google service in Android which might be a motivation to use Android without any Google services. Also everything with a firmware, e.g. a WiFi router or the BIOS of a computer, might either already have or get via firmware update a kill switch. While people got already sensitive concerning hardware from China, this could apply also to hardware that is developed elsewhere.)
The Dutch parliament just approved a series of motions calling on the Dutch government to reduce dependence on U.S. software companies.
Also, if you check the accesses to the web page of european-alternatives.eu you see that the interest European alternatives for digital service and products is rapidly increasing since mid of January 2025, i.e. when the new US administration came into office.
Currently, the Icelandic government is drafting a bill on the future IT system for the Icelandic administration:
- A draft of a new bill has been made. While the 9 articles of the bill itself are very abstract (but give the finance minister more power on deciding centrally on the IT system), the justification that follows towards the end is more interesting to read.
- The first reading was held at the parliament. While Microsoft has been mentioned a couple of times, also Open-Source was mentioned once.
The question is whether a system like Stafrænt Ísland ("Digital Iceland") is created where Icelandic companies win tenders offered by the state and then develop software for the island.is portal (that can be used to access digital government services) (and the developed software is even made available as open-source) or whether one gigantic Microsoft solution is introduced.
In fact, other states are already working on digital sovereignty, for example the German Zentrum Digitale Souveränität, or short: ZenDis, that is working on OpenDesk which is an open-source solution intended for governments and other public institutions as alternative to Microsoft services that are currently used. The German Army just signed a seven year framework contract with ZenDis to introduce OpenDesk.
Therefore, it would be exciting to see the Icelandic government offering tenders for integrating such software into the Icelandic government IT landscape and have then Iceland teams win these tenders. By this, digital sovereignty is achieved and Icelandic tax money stays in Iceland instead of feeding the big US tech companies and expertise is created and stays in Iceland.
I did not find that draft bill number 141 in the comment system of the parliament (umsagnagátt), but the above justification refers to comments that have been made earlier.
Update 10 Apr 2025:
Seem that I missed the window for comments: On 27.03.2025, a request for comments was issued and the deadline was til 06.04.2025. stakeholders have been asked for comments and comments came in right now.
P.S.: The Mozilla subsidiary Thunderbird has just announced that they will be offering Thundermail and Thunderbird-pro services" as an alternative too Google's GMail and Microsoft's Office365. Note that while the Thundermail web mail service is probably hosted in some cloud related to an US provider, the underlying software is supposed to become open-source so that you can host this on you own hardware. (This is anyway based on Stalwart that already provides such an open-source solution. In contrast to Mailcow it might be more commercial. A technical comparison can be found on reddit.